As
a tribute falls, a cannon sounds and a hover copter rushes to pick up the
fallen body. This is the story of the Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins. Some
adults want this story taken away, from younger kids and teenagers because it
is “violent, sexually explicit, offensive”. They go on to say it is
“anti-ethnic, anti family, insensitive, and satanic”. However, The Hunger Games
should not be banned because a few parents don’t want their 14 year olds
reading this book. Anyone who has read the Hunger Games knows the book is not sexually
explicit. While the level of violence in the book is higher then most, the
violent actions in the book are what empower the story. Without it, the impact
of the story would be diminished. And finally, while the complaints were
motivated to get the book banned, all of this started when the movie came out. The
few parents who started weren’t paying attention to what their kids were
reading, starting this whole snowball of complaints. The Hunger Games should
not be banned just because it has some violence in it, and some claims for
banning are not supported with evidence.
Many
parents and school board administrators have wanted to ban the Hunger Games
because of “excessive violence”. However, it is hard to tone down the type of
violence in this kind of story. It is very important in the storyline because
the violent actions in this book hammer the image through, making this a very
compelling and exhilarating book. The dystopian society plot is empowered by a
somewhat large amount of violence, and no violence, no story. “The sheer scale
of its brutal, disturbing violence should be shielded from younger children,
and introduced only alongside careful conversations with parents. But that
doesn’t mean the book should be banned outright.” (Weebly.com 1) However, I do
agree with this, the book should probably not be introduced in elementary
school, but maybe in 7th or 8th grade is an appropriate
year. Outright banning however, is overreacting, and just because it’s violent
does not mean that it will have a negative affect in a child’s learning and
development. On the contrary, it can teach a child some more about the real
world and some politics. The Hunger Games is a good book to read, and should
not be banned just because it is violent.
There
has been a huge wave of complaints against the Hunger Games ever since the
first movie came out. The fact that most parents can’t tell the difference
between a movie and a book is somewhat disturbing. “Apparently parents and
educators are too stupid to know the difference between a book and a movie.”
The movie made the book recognizable, and so parents have wanted to ban this
book ever since. Also, some of the claims are perverse. The Hunger Games being
“sexually explicit” is ludicrous. There is maybe a paragraphs’ worth in the
whole book that is slightly sexually explicit, as well as in the movie. This
makes me think that the critics of the book are people who have never actually
read the book or saw the movie, and are going off of one angry parent on a
random social website. This may be the cause of most of the events that got this
book on the challenged book list. The Hunger Games should not be banned just
from a few angry comments on a social media website.
There
are many reasons why people want to ban the Hunger Games, but I don’t think
that the book should be banned. It is an exhilarating book that deserves to be
read by many. The story is very moving and is very popular. The Hunger Games is
an inspiring book that can teach children about the real world.
Max you had a very good essay. I like how you made edits to your piece form the draft because it really improved. And your arguments made sense. You had a very smart response to banning.
ReplyDelete